[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y6gUAtg4MZC2ZG6v@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2022 09:12:34 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andreas Grünbacher
<andreas.gruenbacher@...il.com>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 4/7] iomap: Add iomap_folio_prepare helper
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:23:34PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:05:05PM +0100, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> > > I'd name this __iomap_get_folio to match __filemap_get_folio.
> >
> > I was looking at it from the filesystem point of view: this helper is
> > meant to be used in ->folio_prepare() handlers, so
> > iomap_folio_prepare() seemed to be a better name than
> > __iomap_get_folio().
>
> Well, I think the right name for the methods that gets a folio is
> probably ->folio_get anyway.
For the a_ops, the convention I've been following is:
folio_mark_dirty()
-> aops->dirty_folio()
-> iomap_dirty_folio()
ie VERB_folio() as the name of the operation, and MODULE_VERB_folio()
as the implementation. Seems to work pretty well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists