[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85b8fe22-a24a-a749-400e-eda20435147d@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:04:08 +0800
From: "lihaoxiang (F)" <lihaoxiang9@...wei.com>
To: <tytso@....edu>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>,
<linfeilong@...wei.com>, <louhongxiang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs:fix repeated output problem with logdump
friendly ping...
On 2022/12/15 10:31, lihaoxiang (F) wrote:
> Hi professor Tytso, we found that logdump has the problem to print circulately in the case which logs area are full of valid transactions. We propose the final solution as follow:
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 17:09:20 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] debugfs:fix repeated output problem with logdump
>
> Currently, the module of logdump with parameter -O or -On might fall
> into printing duplicate transactions circulately.
>
> In fact, it would exit when it check the no magic number in transaction's
> block head. But sometimes there hasn't no magic number block spanning
> the whole log area so it cause the multi meaningless loop until a new no
> magic block was founded.
>
> We record the first blocknr of logs for comparing this value to that when
> it meet the block again. If the comparison is equal then it exit immediately.
>
> Signed-off-by: lihaoxiang <lihaoxiang9@...wei.com>
> ---
> debugfs/logdump.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/debugfs/logdump.c b/debugfs/logdump.c
> index 614414e5..a6d03f5c 100644
> --- a/debugfs/logdump.c
> +++ b/debugfs/logdump.c
> @@ -376,11 +376,14 @@ static void dump_journal(char *cmdname, FILE *out_file,
> journal_header_t *header;
> tid_t transaction;
> unsigned int blocknr = 0;
> + unsigned int last_blocknr;
> + unsigned int first_transaction_blocknr;
> int fc_done;
> __u64 total_len;
> __u32 maxlen;
> int64_t cur_counts = 0;
> bool exist_no_magic = false;
> + bool reverse_flag = false;
>
> /* First, check to see if there's an ext2 superblock header */
> retval = read_journal_block(cmdname, source, 0, buf, 2048);
> @@ -470,10 +473,22 @@ static void dump_journal(char *cmdname, FILE *out_file,
> blocknr = 1;
> }
>
> + first_transaction_blocknr = blocknr;
> + last_blocknr = blocknr - 1;
> +
> while (1) {
> if (dump_old && (dump_counts != -1) && (cur_counts >= dump_counts))
> break;
>
> + if (last_blocknr != (blocknr - 1))
> + reverse_flag = true;
> + last_blocknr = blocknr;
> +
> + if ((blocknr == first_transaction_blocknr) && reverse_flag) {
> + fprintf(out_file, "Dump all %lld journal records.\n", cur_counts);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> retval = read_journal_block(cmdname, source,
> ((ext2_loff_t) blocknr) * blocksize,
> buf, blocksize);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists