linux-ext4 - Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxjWQT5h7ck_AfEWiHCFNDxRWK45XP2kvxbreMPk5XJeig@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:02:59 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next?

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 6:34 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:46:32AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:46 AM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > TBH, most of my fs complaints these days are managerial problems (Are we
> > > spending too much time on LTS?  How on earth do we prioritize projects
> > > with all these drive by bots??  Why can't we support large engineering
> > > efforts better???) than technical.
> >
> > I penciled one session for "FS stable backporting (and other LTS woes)".
> > I made it a cross FS/IO session so we can have this session in the big room
> > and you are welcome to pull this discussion to any direction you want.
>
> Would this make sense to include the MM folks as well?  Certainly MM
> has made the same choice as XFS ("No automatic backports, we will cc:
> stable on patches that make sense").

Yeh that makes sense.
Added MM to that session.

Thanks,
Amir.