lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:02:59 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <>,,,
        xfs <>,
        linux-ext4 <>,
        linux-btrfs <>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <>,, Chandan Babu R <>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF TOPIC] online repair of filesystems: what next?

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 6:34 AM Matthew Wilcox <> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 10:46:32AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:46 AM Darrick J. Wong <> wrote:
> > > TBH, most of my fs complaints these days are managerial problems (Are we
> > > spending too much time on LTS?  How on earth do we prioritize projects
> > > with all these drive by bots??  Why can't we support large engineering
> > > efforts better???) than technical.
> >
> > I penciled one session for "FS stable backporting (and other LTS woes)".
> > I made it a cross FS/IO session so we can have this session in the big room
> > and you are welcome to pull this discussion to any direction you want.
> Would this make sense to include the MM folks as well?  Certainly MM
> has made the same choice as XFS ("No automatic backports, we will cc:
> stable on patches that make sense").

Yeh that makes sense.
Added MM to that session.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists