[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9513017b07522373d9e886478f889867b7cae54d.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 12:57:11 +0200
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz, jack@...e.com,
tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, mark@...heh.com,
jlbec@...lplan.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fs/buffer: clean up block_commit_write
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 06:33 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> You're going to need to redo these patches, I'm afraid. A series of
> patches I wrote just went in that convert __block_commit_write (but
> not block_commit_write) to take a folio instead of a page.
Do you know which git repo merged with your patches?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists