[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230724094354.90817-22-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:43:28 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...morbit.com, tkhai@...ru,
vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, djwong@...nel.org,
brauner@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
steven.price@....com, cel@...nel.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
yujie.liu@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 21/47] mm: workingset: dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker
Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
---
mm/workingset.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index 4686ae363000..4bc85f739b13 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -762,12 +762,7 @@ static unsigned long scan_shadow_nodes(struct shrinker *shrinker,
NULL);
}
-static struct shrinker workingset_shadow_shrinker = {
- .count_objects = count_shadow_nodes,
- .scan_objects = scan_shadow_nodes,
- .seeks = 0, /* ->count reports only fully expendable nodes */
- .flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE | SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
-};
+static struct shrinker *workingset_shadow_shrinker;
/*
* Our list_lru->lock is IRQ-safe as it nests inside the IRQ-safe
@@ -779,7 +774,7 @@ static int __init workingset_init(void)
{
unsigned int timestamp_bits;
unsigned int max_order;
- int ret;
+ int ret = -ENOMEM;
BUILD_BUG_ON(BITS_PER_LONG < EVICTION_SHIFT);
/*
@@ -796,17 +791,24 @@ static int __init workingset_init(void)
pr_info("workingset: timestamp_bits=%d max_order=%d bucket_order=%u\n",
timestamp_bits, max_order, bucket_order);
- ret = prealloc_shrinker(&workingset_shadow_shrinker, "mm-shadow");
- if (ret)
+ workingset_shadow_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE |
+ SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
+ "mm-shadow");
+ if (!workingset_shadow_shrinker)
goto err;
+
ret = __list_lru_init(&shadow_nodes, true, &shadow_nodes_key,
- &workingset_shadow_shrinker);
+ workingset_shadow_shrinker);
if (ret)
goto err_list_lru;
- register_shrinker_prepared(&workingset_shadow_shrinker);
+
+ workingset_shadow_shrinker->count_objects = count_shadow_nodes;
+ workingset_shadow_shrinker->scan_objects = scan_shadow_nodes;
+
+ shrinker_register(workingset_shadow_shrinker);
return 0;
err_list_lru:
- free_prealloced_shrinker(&workingset_shadow_shrinker);
+ shrinker_free_non_registered(workingset_shadow_shrinker);
err:
return ret;
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists