[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230724094354.90817-26-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:43:32 +0800
From: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...morbit.com, tkhai@...ru,
vbabka@...e.cz, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, djwong@...nel.org,
brauner@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
steven.price@....com, cel@...nel.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
yujie.liu@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 25/47] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker
In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously using kfree_rcu(). Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU
read-side critical section when releasing the struct dm_bufio_client.
Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index bc309e41d074..028e30a4b2d0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ struct dm_bufio_client {
sector_t start;
- struct shrinker shrinker;
+ struct shrinker *shrinker;
struct work_struct shrink_work;
atomic_long_t need_shrink;
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink
{
struct dm_bufio_client *c;
- c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
+ c = shrink->private_data;
atomic_long_add(sc->nr_to_scan, &c->need_shrink);
queue_work(dm_bufio_wq, &c->shrink_work);
@@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@ static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink
static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
{
- struct dm_bufio_client *c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
+ struct dm_bufio_client *c = shrink->private_data;
unsigned long count = cache_total(&c->cache);
unsigned long retain_target = get_retain_buffers(c);
unsigned long queued_for_cleanup = atomic_long_read(&c->need_shrink);
@@ -2490,15 +2490,19 @@ struct dm_bufio_client *dm_bufio_client_create(struct block_device *bdev, unsign
INIT_WORK(&c->shrink_work, shrink_work);
atomic_long_set(&c->need_shrink, 0);
- c->shrinker.count_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_count;
- c->shrinker.scan_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_scan;
- c->shrinker.seeks = 1;
- c->shrinker.batch = 0;
- r = register_shrinker(&c->shrinker, "dm-bufio:(%u:%u)",
- MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev), MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
- if (r)
+ c->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "dm-bufio:(%u:%u)",
+ MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev), MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
+ if (!c->shrinker)
goto bad;
+ c->shrinker->count_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_count;
+ c->shrinker->scan_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_scan;
+ c->shrinker->seeks = 1;
+ c->shrinker->batch = 0;
+ c->shrinker->private_data = c;
+
+ shrinker_register(c->shrinker);
+
mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
dm_bufio_client_count++;
list_add(&c->client_list, &dm_bufio_all_clients);
@@ -2537,7 +2541,7 @@ void dm_bufio_client_destroy(struct dm_bufio_client *c)
drop_buffers(c);
- unregister_shrinker(&c->shrinker);
+ shrinker_unregister(c->shrinker);
flush_work(&c->shrink_work);
mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists