[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230805-langzeitfolgen-notation-dfd8a0175060@brauner>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 19:13:13 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] xfs: drop s_umount over opening the log and RT
devices
On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 09:19:04AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2023 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 09:32:19AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > + /* see get_tree_bdev why this is needed and safe */
> > >
> > > Which part of get_tree_bdev? Is it this?
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * s_umount nests inside open_mutex during
> > > * __invalidate_device(). blkdev_put() acquires
> > > * open_mutex and can't be called under s_umount. Drop
> > > * s_umount temporarily. This is safe as we're
> > > * holding an active reference.
> > > */
> > > up_write(&s->s_umount);
> > > blkdev_put(bdev, fc->fs_type);
> > > down_write(&s->s_umount);
> >
> > Yes. With the refactoring earlier in the series get_tree_bdev should
> > be trivial enough to not need a more specific reference. If you
> > think there's a better way to refer to it I can update the comment,
> > though.
>
> How about:
>
> /*
> * blkdev_put can't be called under s_umount, see the comment in
> * get_tree_bdev for more details
> */
>
> with that and the label name change,
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Added that comment and you rvb in-tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists