[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230806031217.13962-1-liusong@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 11:12:17 +0800
From: Liu Song <liusong@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz
Cc: liusong@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: do not mark inode dirty which is already dirtied under append-write scenario
Hi,
Any comments on this? Considering the most extreme scenario
where a file is appended with only one byte each time,
"jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata" will be executed because i_size
has changed. Therefore, it is better to update raw_inode's size
after the writeback is completed, which can also ensure the
consistency of metadata and data, and obtain better performance
benefits in high-frequency append write scenarios.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists