linux-ext4 - Re: [fstests generic/388, 455, 475, 482 ...] Ext4 journal recovery test fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <87o7ie2fmm.fsf@doe.com>
Date:   Thu, 07 Sep 2023 20:29:45 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Zorro Lang <zlang@...nel.org>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, fstests@...r.kernel.org,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [fstests generic/388, 455, 475, 482 ...] Ext4 journal recovery test fails

Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 07:05:38PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Thanks Matthew for proposing the final changes using folio.
>> (there were just some minor change required for fs/reiserfs/ for unused variables)
>> Pasting the final patch below (you as the author with my Signed-off-by &
>> Tested-by), which I have tested it on my system with "ext4/1k -g auto"
>
> I'd rather split that patch up a bit -- I don't think the reiserfs
> part fixes any actual problem.  I've pushed out
> https://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git/shortlog/refs/heads/bh-fixes
>
> or git clone git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git
>
> I credited you as the author on the second two since I just tidied up
> your proposed fixes.
>
> I've also checked ocfs2 as the other user of JBD2 and I don't see any
> problems there.

Thanks Matthew! :) 

-ritesh