linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH -next RFC 01/14] block: add some bdev apis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <189fa9b2-bcc8-4839-ac04-33a29bba9aaa@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 09:03:48 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com,
 colyli@...e.de, kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org,
 miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
 sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
 gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
 martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
 dsterba@...e.com, nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
 tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, agruenba@...hat.com, jack@...e.com,
 konishi.ryusuke@...il.com, willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 hare@...e.de, p.raghav@...sung.com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, gfs2@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org, yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com,
 yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 01/14] block: add some bdev apis

On 12/5/23 04:37, Yu Kuai wrote:
> +static inline u8 block_bits(struct block_device *bdev)
> +{
> +	return bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits;
> +}

This function needs a name that's more descriptive.

Thanks,

Bart.