linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH -next RFC 00/14] block: don't access bd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 21:54:15 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, roger.pau@...rix.com, colyli@...e.de,
	kent.overstreet@...il.com, joern@...ybastard.org,
	miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
	sth@...ux.ibm.com, hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
	gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
	dsterba@...e.com, nico@...xnic.net, xiang@...nel.org,
	chao@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	agruenba@...hat.com, jack@...e.com, konishi.ryusuke@...il.com,
	willy@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hare@...e.de,
	p.raghav@...sung.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	gfs2@...ts.linux.dev, linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC 00/14] block: don't access bd_inode directly
 from other modules

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 08:37:14PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> 
> Patch 1 add some bdev apis, then follow up patches will use these apis
> to avoid access bd_inode directly, and hopefully the field bd_inode can
> be removed eventually(after figure out a way for fs/buffer.c).

What tree is this against?  It fails to apply to either Jens'
for-6.8/block or Linus tree in the very first patch.