linux-ext4 - Re: ext4 data corruption in 6.1 stable tree (was Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/297] 5.15.140-rc1 review)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023120643-evade-legal-ee74@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 02:57:15 +0900
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
	chrubis@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: ext4 data corruption in 6.1 stable tree (was Re: [PATCH 5.15
 000/297] 5.15.140-rc1 review)

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 09:55:08AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 01:21:22PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > 
> > So I've got back to this and the failure is a subtle interaction between
> > iomap code and ext4 code. In particular that fact that commit 936e114a245b6
> > ("iomap: update ki_pos a little later in iomap_dio_complete") is not in
> > stable causes that file position is not updated after direct IO write and
> > thus we direct IO writes are ending in wrong locations effectively
> > corrupting data. The subtle detail is that before this commit if ->end_io
> > handler returns non-zero value (which the new ext4 ->end_io handler does),
> > file pos doesn't get updated, after this commit it doesn't get updated only
> > if the return value is < 0.
> > 
> > The commit got merged in 6.5-rc1 so all stable kernels that have
> > 91562895f803 ("ext4: properly sync file size update after O_SYNC direct
> > IO") before 6.5 are corrupting data - I've noticed at least 6.1 is still
> > carrying the problematic commit. Greg, please take out the commit from all
> > stable kernels before 6.5 as soon as possible, we'll figure out proper
> > backport once user data are not being corrupted anymore. Thanks!
> > 
> 
> Thanks a lot for the update.
> 
> Turns out this is causing a regression in chromeos-6.1, and reverting the
> offending patch fixes the problem. I suspect anyone running v6.1.64+ may
> have a problem.

Jan, thanks for the report, and Guenter, thanks for letting me know as
well.  I'll go queue up the fix now and push out new -rc releases.

greg k-h