lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240102130143.5yngez5r6npn67ky@quack3> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:01:43 +0100 From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] ext4: remove unused parameter group in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_*() On Sun 26-11-23 00:11:37, Kemeng Shi wrote: > Remove unused parameter group in ext4_mb_choose_next_group_*(). > > Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com> Makes sense. Feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Honza > --- > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > index 9f9b8dd06..765b62729 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > @@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ mb_update_avg_fragment_size(struct super_block *sb, struct ext4_group_info *grp) > * cr level needs an update. > */ > static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > - enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups) > + enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group) > { > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); > struct ext4_group_info *iter; > @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ ext4_mb_find_good_group_avg_frag_lists(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, int o > * order. Updates *new_cr if cr level needs an update. > */ > static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > - enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups) > + enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group) > { > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); > struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL; > @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(struct ext4_allocation_context * > * much and fall to CR_GOAL_LEN_SLOW in that case. > */ > static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > - enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups) > + enum criteria *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group) > { > struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb); > struct ext4_group_info *grp = NULL; > @@ -1124,11 +1124,11 @@ static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, > } > > if (*new_cr == CR_POWER2_ALIGNED) { > - ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups); > + ext4_mb_choose_next_group_p2_aligned(ac, new_cr, group); > } else if (*new_cr == CR_GOAL_LEN_FAST) { > - ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups); > + ext4_mb_choose_next_group_goal_fast(ac, new_cr, group); > } else if (*new_cr == CR_BEST_AVAIL_LEN) { > - ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(ac, new_cr, group, ngroups); > + ext4_mb_choose_next_group_best_avail(ac, new_cr, group); > } else { > /* > * TODO: For CR=2, we can arrange groups in an rb tree sorted by > -- > 2.30.0 > > -- Jan Kara <jack@...e.com> SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists