[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240904103703.cwp6jw3vd2cu3szc@quack3>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 12:37:03 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Zorro Lang <zlang@...nel.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, fstests@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: return error on syncfs after shutdown
On Wed 04-09-24 10:46:57, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> This is the logic behavior and one that we would like to verify
> using a generic fstest similar to xfs/546.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20240830152648.GE6216@frogsfrogsfrogs/
> Suggested-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Yeah, makes sense to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
>
> Ted,
>
> Please see the discussion about moving test xfs/546 to generic.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks,
> Amir.
>
> fs/ext4/super.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index e72145c4ae5a..b9cf18819e11 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -6279,7 +6279,7 @@ static int ext4_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
> struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>
> if (unlikely(ext4_forced_shutdown(sb)))
> - return 0;
> + return -EIO;
>
> trace_ext4_sync_fs(sb, wait);
> flush_workqueue(sbi->rsv_conversion_wq);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists