[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250110173048.5565901e0fec24556325bd18@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 17:30:48 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, <lina@...hilina.net>, <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
<gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <logang@...tatee.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<jack@...e.cz>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <npiggin@...il.com>,
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
<willy@...radead.org>, <djwong@...nel.org>, <tytso@....edu>,
<linmiaohe@...wei.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <peterx@...hat.com>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>, <jhubbard@...dia.com>, <hch@....de>,
<david@...morbit.com>, <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, <kernel@...0n.name>,
<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] fs/dax: Fix ZONE_DEVICE page reference counts
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 23:05:56 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> > - Remove PTE_DEVMAP definitions from Loongarch which were added since
> > this series was initially written.
> [..]
> >
> > base-commit: e25c8d66f6786300b680866c0e0139981273feba
>
> If this is going to go through nvdimm.git I will need it against a
> mainline tag baseline. Linus will want to see the merge conflicts.
>
> Otherwise if that merge commit is too messy, or you would rather not
> rebase, then it either needs to go one of two options:
>
> - Andrew's tree which is the only tree I know of that can carry
> patches relative to linux-next.
I used to be able to do that but haven't got around to setting up such
a thing with mm.git. This is the first time the need has arisen,
really.
> - Wait for v6.14-rc1
I'm thinking so. Darrick's review comments indicate that we'll be seeing a v7.
> and get this into nvdimm.git early in the cycle
> when the conflict storm will be low.
erk. This patchset hits mm/ a lot, and nvdimm hardly at all. Is it
not practical to carry this in mm.git?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists