[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6781e71d986e7_2aff4294d4@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 19:35:57 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Dan Williams
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>
CC: Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, <lina@...hilina.net>, <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
<gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
<dave.jiang@...el.com>, <logang@...tatee.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<jack@...e.cz>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, <npiggin@...il.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
<ira.weiny@...el.com>, <willy@...radead.org>, <djwong@...nel.org>,
<tytso@....edu>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
<peterx@...hat.com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<jhubbard@...dia.com>, <hch@....de>, <david@...morbit.com>,
<chenhuacai@...nel.org>, <kernel@...0n.name>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/26] fs/dax: Fix ZONE_DEVICE page reference counts
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 23:05:56 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > > - Remove PTE_DEVMAP definitions from Loongarch which were added since
> > > this series was initially written.
> > [..]
> > >
> > > base-commit: e25c8d66f6786300b680866c0e0139981273feba
> >
> > If this is going to go through nvdimm.git I will need it against a
> > mainline tag baseline. Linus will want to see the merge conflicts.
> >
> > Otherwise if that merge commit is too messy, or you would rather not
> > rebase, then it either needs to go one of two options:
> >
> > - Andrew's tree which is the only tree I know of that can carry
> > patches relative to linux-next.
>
> I used to be able to do that but haven't got around to setting up such
> a thing with mm.git. This is the first time the need has arisen,
> really.
Oh, good to know.
>
> > - Wait for v6.14-rc1
>
> I'm thinking so. Darrick's review comments indicate that we'll be seeing a v7.
>
> > and get this into nvdimm.git early in the cycle
> > when the conflict storm will be low.
>
> erk. This patchset hits mm/ a lot, and nvdimm hardly at all. Is it
> not practical to carry this in mm.git?
I'm totally fine with it going through mm.git. nvdimm.git is just the
historical path for touches to fs/dax.c, and git blame points mostly to
me for the issues Alistair is fixing. I am happy to review and ack and
watch this go through mm.git.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists