[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87semovbrk.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 09:06:15 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, djwong@...nel.org, zlang@...nel.org, david@...morbit.com, nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] check: Remove redundant _test_mount in check
"Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com> writes:
> init_rc already does a _test_mount. Hence removing the additional
> _test_mount call when OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS != TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
> ---
> check | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/check b/check
> index 32890470..16bf1586 100755
> --- a/check
> +++ b/check
> @@ -792,12 +792,6 @@ function run_section()
> _prepare_test_list
> elif [ "$OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" != "$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" ]; then
> _test_unmount 2> /dev/null
Would have been nicer if there was a small comment here like:
elif [ "$OLD_TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" != "$TEST_FS_MOUNT_OPTS" ]; then
# Unmount TEST_DEV to apply the updated mount options.
# It will be mounted again by init_rc(), called shortly after.
_test_unmount 2> /dev/null
fi
init_rc
But either ways, no strong preference for adding comments here.
Feel free to add -
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
> - if ! _test_mount
> - then
> - echo "check: failed to mount $TEST_DEV on $TEST_DIR"
> - status=1
> - exit
> - fi
> fi
>
> init_rc
> --
> 2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists