[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCIVbuot62pZu9xk@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 08:36:14 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
fstests@...r.kernel.org, ritesh.list@...il.com,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, djwong@...nel.org, zlang@...nel.org,
david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org, cem@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] xfs: Fail remount with noattr2 on a v5 with v4
enabled
This still looks good.
One nit:
> + /*
> + * Now that mp has been modified according to the remount options,
> + * we do a final option validation with xfs_finish_flags()
> + * just like it is done during mount. We cannot use
> + * xfs_finish_flags()on new_mp as it contains only the user
> + * given options.
This could use slightly better formatting:
/*
* Now that mp has been modified according to the remount options, we
* do a final option validation with xfs_finish_flags() just like it is
* done during mount. We cannot use xfs_finish_flags() on new_mp as it
* contains only the user given options.
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists