linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] new: Replace "status=0; exit 0" with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87cyc7wzg1.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2025 11:28:38 +0530
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: "Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com, djwong@...nel.org, zlang@...nel.org, david@...morbit.com, nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] new: Replace "status=0; exit 0" with _exit 0

"Nirjhar Roy (IBM)" <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com> writes:

> We should now start using _exit 0 for every new test
> that we add.
>

Right every test now sources common/exit in _begin_test() preamble.
So we may as well start using _exit for new tests.

Looks good to me. Please feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>


> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy (IBM) <nirjhar.roy.lists@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>
> ---
>  new | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/new b/new
> index 636648e2..dff69265 100755
> --- a/new
> +++ b/new
> @@ -176,8 +176,7 @@ exit
>  #echo "If failure, check \$seqres.full (this) and \$seqres.full.ok (reference)"
>  
>  # success, all done
> -status=0
> -exit
> +_exit 0
>  End-of-File
>  
>  sleep 2		# latency to read messages to this point
> -- 
> 2.34.1