[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250701194535.GI9987@frogsfrogsfrogs>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 12:45:35 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4 docs toctree reorganization
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:11:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Jon, hi Ted,
> >
> > While discussing on my previous ext4 docs reorganization attempt
> > by merging contents [1], Jon suggested that considering current docs
> > file structure, a proper toctree would be ideal [2]. So, here's
> > the patchset that does exactly that.
> >
> > Actual conversion to toctree structure is in [1/5], while the rest
> > is cleanups to make the resulting toctree nicer.
> >
> > This patchset is based on docs-next tree.
>
> So to me this seems like an improvement. I'm happy to take it, though
> would prefer an ack from ext4land if possible.
I did, yesterday:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/87y0t7rajm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net/T/#mc3ea7f04fc1b0e4294bce6bd60f5f605017f6f7c
Though I'm also happy not to be thought of as part of 'ext4land' ;)
--D
> Thanks,
>
> jon
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists