[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h5zvr8mi.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 13:52:53 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Documentation
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ext4 docs toctree reorganization
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 01:11:25PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> writes:
>>
>> > Hi Jon, hi Ted,
>> >
>> > While discussing on my previous ext4 docs reorganization attempt
>> > by merging contents [1], Jon suggested that considering current docs
>> > file structure, a proper toctree would be ideal [2]. So, here's
>> > the patchset that does exactly that.
>> >
>> > Actual conversion to toctree structure is in [1/5], while the rest
>> > is cleanups to make the resulting toctree nicer.
>> >
>> > This patchset is based on docs-next tree.
>>
>> So to me this seems like an improvement. I'm happy to take it, though
>> would prefer an ack from ext4land if possible.
>
> I did, yesterday:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/87y0t7rajm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net/T/#mc3ea7f04fc1b0e4294bce6bd60f5f605017f6f7c
>
> Though I'm also happy not to be thought of as part of 'ext4land' ;)
Yup, I have your ack ... if that's good enough I'll proceed. You can be
from wherever you want as far as I'm concerned :)
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists