[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHNNwZAzecVcJXZmycX063-=p-M5jVkfStfgYVKJruOFo7y9zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:24:48 +0200
From: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
To: Askar Safin <safinaskar@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andy.shevchenko@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
brauner@...nel.org, cyphar@...har.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
ecurtin@...hat.com, email2tema@...il.com, graf@...zon.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hca@...ux.ibm.com, hch@....de,
hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com, initramfs@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de, kees@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-openrisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, mcgrof@...nel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, monstr@...str.eu, mzxreary@...inter.de,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, rob@...dley.net, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de, thorsten.blum@...ux.dev,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/62] initrd: remove classic initrd support
Hello,
> > When booting with root=/dev/ram0 in the kernel commandline,
> > handle_initrd() where the deprecation message resides is never called,
> > which is rather unfortunate (init/do_mounts_initrd.c):
> Yes, this is unfortunate.
>
> I personally still think that initrd should be removed.
Considering that the deprecation message didn't get displayed in some
configurations, maybe it's a bit early at the very least.
> I suggest using workaround I described in cover letter.
I'm not too keen on having an initramfs just to loop-mount
/sys/firmware/initrd, after all current kernels are able to handle the
use case just fine.
It looks like there is a lot of code calling into specific filesystems
so that the initrd code can guess the size of the file system before
copying into /dev/ram0, and I believe this is what causes the main
gripe against initrd today. What is wrong with just copying
/initrd.image using its actual size into /dev/ram0 instead of guessing
it with the help of filesystem specific code ?
> Also, for unknown reasons I didn't get your letter in my inbox.
> (Not even in spam folder.) I ocasionally found it on lore.kernel.org .
Sorry about that, When I used git-send-email yesterday to reply, the
SMTP server I used wasn't authenticated to google, so all gmail
recipients were dropped. Hopefully this work better today.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Schichan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists