linux-hardening - [PATCH v2][next] x86/uv/time: Replace one-element array and save heap space

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20201001145608.GA10204@embeddedor>
Date:   Thu, 1 Oct 2020 09:56:08 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To:     Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <dimitri.sivanich@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <russ.anderson@....com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2][next] x86/uv/time: Replace one-element array and save
 heap space

There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

struct uv_rtc_timer_head contains a one-element array cpu[1].

Switch it to a flexible array and use the struct_size() helper to
calculate the allocation size. Also, save some heap space in the
process[3].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200518190114.GA7757@embeddedor/

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f75bc0a.rQcNS6620b2eA74S%25lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
---
Changes in v2:
 - Modify changelog text (Thomas).
 - Add Reviewed-by and Build-tested-by tags.
 - Add a public link to the build-test results.

 arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
index f82a1337a608..6c348c2d0def 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct uv_rtc_timer_head {
 	struct {
 		int	lcpu;		/* systemwide logical cpu number */
 		u64	expires;	/* next timer expiration for this cpu */
-	} cpu[1];
+	} cpu[];
 };
 
 /*
@@ -148,9 +148,8 @@ static __init int uv_rtc_allocate_timers(void)
 		struct uv_rtc_timer_head *head = blade_info[bid];
 
 		if (!head) {
-			head = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct uv_rtc_timer_head) +
-				(uv_blade_nr_possible_cpus(bid) *
-					2 * sizeof(u64)),
+			head = kmalloc_node(struct_size(head, cpu,
+				uv_blade_nr_possible_cpus(bid)),
 				GFP_KERNEL, nid);
 			if (!head) {
 				uv_rtc_deallocate_timers();
-- 
2.27.0