lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20201123225449.GQ21644@embeddedor>
Date:   Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:54:49 -0600
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To:     Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 060/141] habanalabs: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 02:34:23PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 8:33 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
> <gustavoars@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> > by explicitly adding a fallthrough pseudo-keyword instead of letting the
> > code fall through to the next case.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c
> > index 2519a34e25b7..eab4c0dc65c5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/gaudi/gaudi.c
> > @@ -5436,6 +5436,7 @@ static void gaudi_handle_ecc_event(struct hl_device *hdev, u16 event_type,
> >                 params.num_memories = 33;
> >                 params.derr = true;
> >                 params.disable_clock_gating = true;
> > +               fallthrough;
> >         default:
> >                 return;
> >         }
> > --
> > 2.27.0
> >
> Hi Gustavo,
> So this is actually an error in the code, there shouldn't be a
> fallthrough there.
> So NAK for this patch, I'll have to send a fix for that.
> Thanks for catching this :)

Awesome. Glad this helped to catch a bug. :)

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ