[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210304230049.GB106177@embeddedor>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:00:49 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 112/141] net: rose: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang
Hi all,
It's been more than 3 months; who can take this, please? :)
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:38:32PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
> letting the code fall through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> net/rose/rose_route.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
> index 6e35703ff353..c0e04c261a15 100644
> --- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
> +++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ static int rose_del_node(struct rose_route_struct *rose_route,
> case 1:
> rose_node->neighbour[1] =
> rose_node->neighbour[2];
> + break;
> case 2:
> break;
> }
> @@ -508,6 +509,7 @@ void rose_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
> fallthrough;
> case 1:
> t->neighbour[1] = t->neighbour[2];
> + break;
> case 2:
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists