linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 045/141] net: mscc: ocelot: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 4 Mar 2021 23:01:09 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
CC:     Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 045/141] net: mscc: ocelot: Fix fall-through warnings for
 Clang

Hi Gustavo,

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 04:53:18PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's been more than 3 months; who can take this, please? :)
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:31:13PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of just letting the code
> > fall through to the next case.
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> > ---

You'd obviously need to resend. But when you do please add my:

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>

And by the way, I think the netdev maintainers might want to take the
patches on network drivers to avoid conflicts, but on the other hand
they might not be too keen on cherry-picking bits and pieces of your 141
patch series. Would you mind creating a bundle of patches only for
netdev? I see there's definitely more than just one patch, they would
certainly get in a lot quicker that way.