[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YMpX0S/Xeis0kKoP@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 21:58:09 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
Allen Pais <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
wengjianfeng <wengjianfeng@...ong.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mwl8k: Avoid memcpy() over-reading of ETH_SS_STATS
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:52:42PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid
> intentionally reading across neighboring array fields. Use the
> sub-structure address directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwl8k.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwl8k.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwl8k.c
> index 84b32a5f01ee..3bf6571f4149 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwl8k.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwl8k.c
> @@ -4552,7 +4552,7 @@ static int mwl8k_cmd_update_stadb_add(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> else
> rates = sta->supp_rates[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] << 5;
> legacy_rate_mask_to_array(p->legacy_rates, rates);
> - memcpy(p->ht_rates, sta->ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask, 16);
> + memcpy(p->ht_rates, &sta->ht_cap.mcs, 16);
> p->interop = 1;
> p->amsdu_enabled = 0;
>
> @@ -5034,7 +5034,7 @@ mwl8k_bss_info_changed_sta(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
> ap_legacy_rates =
> ap->supp_rates[NL80211_BAND_5GHZ] << 5;
> }
> - memcpy(ap_mcs_rates, ap->ht_cap.mcs.rx_mask, 16);
> + memcpy(ap_mcs_rates, &ap->ht_cap.mcs, 16);
>
> rcu_read_unlock();
This does not appear to have anything to do with ETH_SS_STATS which is
what the Subject: says.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists