lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:02:43 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, EJ Hsu <ejh@...dia.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8152: Avoid memcpy() over-reading of ETH_SS_STATS

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 12:53:03PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
> field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid
> intentionally reading across neighboring array fields.
> 
> The memcpy() is copying the entire structure, not just the first array.
> Adjust the source argument so the compiler can do appropriate bounds
> checking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> index 85039e17f4cd..5f08720bf1c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> @@ -8678,7 +8678,7 @@ static void rtl8152_get_strings(struct net_device *dev, u32 stringset, u8 *data)
>  {
>  	switch (stringset) {
>  	case ETH_SS_STATS:
> -		memcpy(data, *rtl8152_gstrings, sizeof(rtl8152_gstrings));
> +		memcpy(data, rtl8152_gstrings, sizeof(rtl8152_gstrings));
>  		break;

Is this correct? The call is supposed to return all the statistic
strings, which would be the entire structure.

	  Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists