lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 15:23:40 -0700 From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] sata_fsl: Use struct_group() for memcpy() region On 1/12/22 3:06 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time > field bounds checking for memcpy(), memmove(), and memset(), avoid > intentionally writing across neighboring fields. > > Use struct_group() in struct command_desc around members acmd and fill, > so they can be referenced together. This will allow memset(), memcpy(), > and sizeof() to more easily reason about sizes, improve readability, > and avoid future warnings about writing beyond the end of acmd: > > In function 'fortify_memset_chk', > inlined from 'sata_fsl_qc_prep' at drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c:534:3: > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:199:4: warning: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with attribute warning: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] > 199 | __write_overflow_field(); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> > Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> > --- > Jens, can you take (or Ack) this? It's a dependency for the FORTIFY_SOURCE > improvements that are close to being finished. :) I don't maintain libata anymore, so Damien is the guy to nudge ;-) -- Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists