[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220831181140.842093-1-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:11:40 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] overflow: Split up kunit tests for smaller stack frames
Under some pathological 32-bit configs, the shift overflow KUnit tests
create huge stack frames. Split up the function to avoid this,
separating by rough shift overflow cases.
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitor Massaru Iha <vitor@...saru.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202208301850.iuv9VwA8-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
lib/overflow_kunit.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/overflow_kunit.c b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
index 0d98c9bc75da..f385ca652b74 100644
--- a/lib/overflow_kunit.c
+++ b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
@@ -304,10 +304,6 @@ DEFINE_TEST_ARRAY_TYPED(int, int, u8) = {
};
DEFINE_TEST_FUNC_TYPED(int_int__u8, u8, "%d");
-static void overflow_shift_test(struct kunit *test)
-{
- int count = 0;
-
/* Args are: value, shift, type, expected result, overflow expected */
#define TEST_ONE_SHIFT(a, s, t, expect, of) do { \
typeof(a) __a = (a); \
@@ -331,6 +327,10 @@ static void overflow_shift_test(struct kunit *test)
count++; \
} while (0)
+static void shift_sane_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int count = 0;
+
/* Sane shifts. */
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(1, 0, u8, 1 << 0, false);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(1, 4, u8, 1 << 4, false);
@@ -373,6 +373,13 @@ static void overflow_shift_test(struct kunit *test)
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 30, s32, 0, false);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 62, s64, 0, false);
+ kunit_info(test, "%d sane shift tests finished\n", count);
+}
+
+static void shift_overflow_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int count = 0;
+
/* Overflow: shifted the bit off the end. */
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(1, 8, u8, 0, true);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(1, 16, u16, 0, true);
@@ -420,6 +427,13 @@ static void overflow_shift_test(struct kunit *test)
/* 0100000100001000001000000010000001000010000001000100010001001011 */
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(4686030735197619275LL, 2, s64, 0, true);
+ kunit_info(test, "%d overflow shift tests finished\n", count);
+}
+
+static void shift_truncate_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int count = 0;
+
/* Overflow: values larger than destination type. */
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0x100, 0, u8, 0, true);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0xFF, 0, s8, 0, true);
@@ -431,6 +445,33 @@ static void overflow_shift_test(struct kunit *test)
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0xFFFFFFFFUL, 0, int, 0, true);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL, 0, s64, 0, true);
+ /* Overflow: shifted at or beyond entire type's bit width. */
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 8, u8, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 9, u8, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 8, s8, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 9, s8, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 16, u16, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 17, u16, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 16, s16, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 17, s16, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 32, u32, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 33, u32, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 32, int, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 33, int, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 32, s32, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 33, s32, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 64, u64, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 65, u64, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 64, s64, 0, true);
+ TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 65, s64, 0, true);
+
+ kunit_info(test, "%d truncate shift tests finished\n", count);
+}
+
+static void shift_nonsense_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ int count = 0;
+
/* Nonsense: negative initial value. */
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(-1, 0, s8, 0, true);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(-1, 0, u8, 0, true);
@@ -455,26 +496,6 @@ static void overflow_shift_test(struct kunit *test)
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, -30, s64, 0, true);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, -30, u64, 0, true);
- /* Overflow: shifted at or beyond entire type's bit width. */
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 8, u8, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 9, u8, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 8, s8, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 9, s8, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 16, u16, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 17, u16, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 16, s16, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 17, s16, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 32, u32, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 33, u32, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 32, int, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 33, int, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 32, s32, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 33, s32, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 64, u64, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 65, u64, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 64, s64, 0, true);
- TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 65, s64, 0, true);
-
/*
* Corner case: for unsigned types, we fail when we've shifted
* through the entire width of bits. For signed types, we might
@@ -490,9 +511,9 @@ static void overflow_shift_test(struct kunit *test)
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 31, s32, 0, false);
TEST_ONE_SHIFT(0, 63, s64, 0, false);
- kunit_info(test, "%d shift tests finished\n", count);
-#undef TEST_ONE_SHIFT
+ kunit_info(test, "%d nonsense shift tests finished\n", count);
}
+#undef TEST_ONE_SHIFT
/*
* Deal with the various forms of allocator arguments. See comments above
@@ -703,7 +724,10 @@ static struct kunit_case overflow_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(u32_u32__int_overflow_test),
KUNIT_CASE(u8_u8__int_overflow_test),
KUNIT_CASE(int_int__u8_overflow_test),
- KUNIT_CASE(overflow_shift_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(shift_sane_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(shift_overflow_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(shift_truncate_test),
+ KUNIT_CASE(shift_nonsense_test),
KUNIT_CASE(overflow_allocation_test),
KUNIT_CASE(overflow_size_helpers_test),
{}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists