linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fortify: Fix __compiletime_strlen() under UBSAN_BOUNDS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmeaUQYkd9kZPgwK0kK5BRxFi8aszyFzw8TA4JFF6y8EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2022 19:36:46 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Isabella Basso <isabbasso@...eup.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fortify: Fix __compiletime_strlen() under UBSAN_BOUNDS_LOCAL

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 1:43 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Co-developed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>

That's overly generous of you!

Anyways, the disassembly LGTM and the bot also came back green.

Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Android Treehugger Robot
Link: https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/kernel/common/+/2206839

Another thought, Nikita suggested that you could also compare mode 1 vs mode 3:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57510#issuecomment-1235126343

That said, since mode 3 returns 0 for "unknown" I'd imagine that
wouldn't be pretty since it wouldn't be a direct comparison against
__p_size.

Thanks again for the patch!

> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/fortify-string.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fortify-string.h b/include/linux/fortify-string.h
> index eed2119b23c5..07d5d1921eff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fortify-string.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fortify-string.h
> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ void __write_overflow_field(size_t avail, size_t wanted) __compiletime_warning("
>         unsigned char *__p = (unsigned char *)(p);              \
>         size_t __ret = (size_t)-1;                              \
>         size_t __p_size = __builtin_object_size(p, 1);          \
> -       if (__p_size != (size_t)-1) {                           \
> +       if (__p_size != (size_t)-1 &&                           \
> +           __builtin_constant_p(*__p)) {                       \
>                 size_t __p_len = __p_size - 1;                  \
>                 if (__builtin_constant_p(__p[__p_len]) &&       \
>                     __p[__p_len] == '\0')                       \
> --
> 2.34.1
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers