lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202209251738.2E6B9C29D@keescook> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 17:41:23 -0700 From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>, Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, dev@...nvswitch.org, x86@...nel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/16] skbuff: Phase out ksize() fallback for frag_size On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 09:17:40AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 13:28 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > All callers of APIs that allowed a 0-sized frag_size appear to be > > passing actual size information already > > AFAICS, not yet: > > drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ll2.c: > skb = build_skb(buffer->data, 0); // -> __build_skb(..., 0) > // -> __build_skb_around() > > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c: > skb = build_skb(data, 0); > > I guess some more drivers have calls leading to > > __build_skb_around(..., 0) > > there are several call path to checks... Ah-ha! Thank you. I will try to hunt these down -- I think we can't remove the "secret resizing" effect of ksize() without fixing these. > > [...] > > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c > > index 0b30fbdbd0d0..84ca89c781cd 100644 > > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c > > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c > > @@ -195,7 +195,11 @@ static void __build_skb_around(struct sk_buff *skb, void *data, > > unsigned int frag_size) > > { > > struct skb_shared_info *shinfo; > > - unsigned int size = frag_size ? : ksize(data); > > + unsigned int size = frag_size; > > + > > + /* All callers should be setting frag size now? */ > > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size == 0)) > > + size = ksize(data); > > At some point in the future, I guess we could even drop this check, > right? Alternatively, we might be able to ask the slab if "data" came from kmalloc or a kmem_cache, and if the former, do: data = krealloc(kmalloc_size_roundup(ksize(data), ...) But that seems ugly... -- Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists