lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:46:44 -0300 From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>, Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Paramjit Oberoi <pso@...omium.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pstore/ram: Move internal definitions out of kernel-wide include On 11/10/2022 17:01, Kees Cook wrote: > Most of the details of the ram backend are entirely internal to the > backend itself. Leave only what is needed to instantiate a ram backend > in the kernel-wide header. > > Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org> > Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> > Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> > --- Reviewed-and-tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com> Tested by building and booting the kernel - since it's just header file rework, guess this is enough right? BTW, let me know if you prefer me to respond on the series once or per patch Kees (as I'm doing here). Cheers, Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists