linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH 3/5] pstore/ram: Move internal definitions out of kernel-wide include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:46:44 -0300
From:   "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Paramjit Oberoi <pso@...omium.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pstore/ram: Move internal definitions out of
 kernel-wide include

On 11/10/2022 17:01, Kees Cook wrote:
> Most of the details of the ram backend are entirely internal to the
> backend itself. Leave only what is needed to instantiate a ram backend
> in the kernel-wide header.
> 
> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>
> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---

Reviewed-and-tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>

Tested by building and booting the kernel - since it's just header file
rework, guess this is enough right?

BTW, let me know if you prefer me to respond on the series once or per
patch Kees (as I'm doing here).

Cheers,

Guilherme