[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202210121451.7CEC6637@keescook>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:51:52 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Paramjit Oberoi <pso@...omium.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] pstore/ram: Move internal definitions out of
kernel-wide include
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 04:46:44PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> On 11/10/2022 17:01, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Most of the details of the ram backend are entirely internal to the
> > backend itself. Leave only what is needed to instantiate a ram backend
> > in the kernel-wide header.
> >
> > Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>
> > Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
> > Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > ---
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@...lia.com>
>
> Tested by building and booting the kernel - since it's just header file
> rework, guess this is enough right?
>
> BTW, let me know if you prefer me to respond on the series once or per
> patch Kees (as I'm doing here).
Thanks! Yeah, per-patch is good. :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists