[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202308101328.40620220CB@keescook>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:31:16 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: stable-rc: 6.1: gcc-plugins: Reorganize gimple includes for GCC
13
On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 10:57:30AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> LKFT build plans updated with toolchain gcc-13 and here is the report.
>
> Stable rc 6.1 arm64 builds with gcc-13 failed and the bisection is pointing
> to this as first bad commit,
>
> # first fixed commit: [e6a71160cc145e18ab45195abf89884112e02dfb]
> gcc-plugins: Reorganize gimple includes for GCC 13
>
> Thanks Anders for bisecting this problem against Linux 6.2-rc6.
>
> Build errors:
> ---------------
> In file included from /builds/linux/scripts/gcc-plugins/gcc-common.h:75,
> from /builds/linux/scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.c:30:
> /usr/lib/gcc-cross/aarch64-linux-gnu/13/plugin/include/gimple-fold.h:72:32:
> error: use of enum 'gsi_iterator_update' without previous declaration
> 72 | enum gsi_iterator_update,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
I'm slightly confused by this report. Is it the build of v6.1 that is
failing? Commit e6a71160cc14 ("gcc-plugins: Reorganize gimple includes
for GCC 13") was added in v6.2.
I think you're saying you need it backported to the v6.1 stable tree?
("First bad commit" is really the first good commit?)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists