lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACi=Ov58mGYT65kE2eHVx54v1g61Kpnn=pw4ETPmJBWuiJ3aOA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 21:56:41 +0200 From: Luka Panio <lukapanio@...il.com> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, "Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-xiaomi-pipa: Add initial device tree On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 8:46 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote: > If there are no other copyrights here, why did you use BSD-3 license? I am by no means a licensing expert, but as sm8250.dts did use BSD-3 and other device tree's (for example sm8250-xiaomi-elish-boe.dts) did use it, I thought I should do the same. Should I drop it? > > chassis-type > > It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run > `make dtbs_check W=1` (see > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or > https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/ > for instructions). > Thanks, will do. > 0x34 or 34? Yes 0x24, should i tend to use decimal? Thanks, Luka P.S. Sorry if you got duplicated email
Powered by blists - more mailing lists