[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240214191801.GA27799@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 20:18:01 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>
Cc: coverity-bot <keescook@...omium.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peng Zhang <zhangpeng.00@...edance.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tandersen@...flix.com>,
Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Coverity: __do_sys_pidfd_send_signal(): UNINIT
On 02/14, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 06:55:55PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > We want to check the "flags" argument at the start, we do not want to
> > delay the "case 0:" check until we have f.file (so that we can check
> > f.file->f_flags).
>
> Fair point. I was thinking delaying it would make it simpler, but then
> you have to free the file and it's less fast in the EINVAL case.
plus we do not want to return, say, -EBADF if the "flags" argument is wrong.
> I also don't have a strong opinion here.
Neither me.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists