[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABi2SkVAXhqb+r5HzD5fWnHs1g2tjg8CShXX0+xnagqeVXrttA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 09:12:00 -0700
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@...omium.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
keescook@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
adhemerval.zanella@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, jorgelo@...omium.org,
sroettger@...gle.com, ojeda@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
anna-maria@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
Jason@...c4.com, deller@....de, rdunlap@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net,
hch@....de, peterx@...hat.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
gerg@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org,
ardb@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ardb@...gle.com, enh@...gle.com, rientjes@...gle.com, groeck@...omium.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/1] exec: seal system mappings
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:38 AM Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/16, Jeff Xu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 6:10 PM Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > + exec.seal_system_mappings = [KNL]
> > > > + Format: { never | always }
> > > > + Seal system mappings: vdso, vvar, sigpage, uprobes,
> > > > + vsyscall.
> > > > + This overwrites KCONFIG CONFIG_SEAL_SYSTEM_MAPPINGS_*
> > > > + - 'never': never seal system mappings.
> > >
> > > Not true, uprobes are sealed when 'never' is selected.
> > >
> > Thanks. I forgot to uprobes from the description in Kconfig and
> > kernel-parameters.txt, will update.
>
> Jeff, I am sorry for confusion.
>
> No need to make uprobes "special" and complicate the logic/documentation.
>
> I just meant that, unlike vdso, it is always safe/good to mseal the "[uprobes]"
> vma, regardless of config/boot options.
>
> Please do what you think is right, I am fine either way.
>
OK, in that case, V1 is a better approach, using the same config to
control all system mappings.
I will send V1 to revert that.
Thanks for clarifying.
-Jeff
> Oleg.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists