[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55e010d1-4f98-40f1-b009-78580f895b86@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:32:57 +1030
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3][next] tty: tty_buffer: Avoid hundreds of
-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings
>
>> @@ -576,11 +579,14 @@ int tty_insert_flip_string_and_push_buffer(struct tty_port *port,
>> void tty_buffer_init(struct tty_port *port)
>> {
>> struct tty_bufhead *buf = &port->buf;
>> + struct tty_buffer *buf_sentinel;
>> +
>> + buf_sentinel = container_of(&buf->sentinel, struct tty_buffer, hdr);
>
> Bah, so this is ugly and even dangerous if someone adds a member to tty_buffer outside _hdr.
>
> We should link headers in the list, it appears.
What should that patch look like?
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists