linux-hardening - Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] fc_els: use 'union fc_tlv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f021d24-280e-4b7c-b79f-36434ef99c0b@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 06:15:31 -0400
From: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@...hat.com>
To: Justin Tee <justintee8345@...il.com>
Cc: hare@...e.de, kbusch@...nel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
 linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
 bgurney@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, emilne@...hat.com,
 gustavoars@...nel.org, hch@....de, james.smart@...adcom.com,
 Justin Tee <justin.tee@...adcom.com>, kees@...nel.org,
 linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, njavali@...vell.com, sagi@...mberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] fc_els: use 'union fc_tlv_desc'

On 9/29/25 1:44 PM, Justin Tee wrote:> Hi John,
> 
> Which branch is this patch based on?  include/uapi/scsi/fc/fc_els.h
> does not apply cleanly on 6.18/scsi-queue.

It's in the patch cover letter.  I've re-based V11 onto nvme-6.18.
  
> Presumably, is this patch based on a branch without?
> 44b6169ada7f scsi: fc: Avoid -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end warnings

Yes
  
> Regards,
> Justin
>