linux-kernel - Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607141417370.4210@p34.internal.lan>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:17:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To:	Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Sander <sander@...ilis.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!



On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:

> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:
>> 
>>> So, the drive is rejecting an LBA48 WRITE operation, which should happen
>>> only if the drive does not have LBA48 support.  Now, I know you posted all
>>> of this nice info months ago, but let's see it again now, for the exact
>>> drive that is generating that specific message.  We need to see the output
>>> from "hdparm --Istdout /dev/sdX" for that drive.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>> 
>> Here it is:
>> 
>> They are identical disks (the WD 400KD), both show up as 373GB (formatted):
>
>
> Which *exact* unit generated the WRITE errors you posted about?
>

Both have generated the errors, they are identical drives and firmware.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/