[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0607141418240.4210@p34.internal.lan>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:18:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
To: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, Sander <sander@...ilis.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:
> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>> They are Western Digital 400* drives.
>>
>> [4294678.049000] Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD4000KD-00N Rev: 01.0
>> [4294678.050000] Vendor: ATA Model: WDC WD4000KD-00N Rev: 01.0
>>
>> On a SiL controller, it also happens when they are on a promise controller
>> too.
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:
>>
>>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> opcode=0x35 & opcode=0xca
>>>
>>> Those are non-DMA WRITE opcodes. Using PIO for I/O is pretty rare these
>>> days,
>>> so I'm betting that this is not a hard disk device -- compactflash?
>
> Okay. So why are we issuing PIO WRITE commands to drives that
> obviously should only be sent DMA commands by libata?
>
> Perhaps that's the bug.
>
Jeff/Alan -- ? Could this be it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists