[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1152974578.3114.24.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:42:57 +0200
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin@...erbrooke.ca>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@...-job.com>,
Esben Nielsen <nielsen.esben@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Where is RLIMIT_RT_CPU?
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 00:19 +1000, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> > Non-root RT tasks are not "unprivileged" - they have a level of
> > privileges between a normal user and root. Really I think it's OK for
> > these tasks to consume 100% CPU, as the admin has explicitly allowed it.
>
> Sure, if the admin has allowed it, but I think it's also OK for desktop
> users to have access to rt scheduling by default, as long as their tasks
> are "well-behaved" (i.e. only use a few percent CPU).
>
> > The only problem is that Ubuntu shipped with this enabled for everyone.
>
> The problem is not the fact that it's enabled, but the fact that the
> amount of CPU allowed isn't restricted.
as long as you can fork and exec as many of those processes as you want
a per process rlimit is useless security wise... an evil user just fires
off a second process just before the first one gets killed and a non-RT
root still is starved out.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists