linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for 2.6.18-rc2] [2/8] i386/x86-64: Don't randomize stack top when no randomization personality is set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:14:07 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, discuss@...-64.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.18-rc2] [2/8] i386/x86-64: Don't randomize stack top when no randomization personality is set

On Sunday 16 July 2006 22:47, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> >  unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp)
> >  {
> > -	if (randomize_va_space)
> > +	if (!(current->personality & ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) && randomize_va_space)
> >  		sp -= get_random_int() % 8192;
> >  	return sp & ~0xf;
>
> i'm not opposing this patch at all, but didnt the performance problems
> go away when the 0xf was changed to 0x7f?

Yes, but i sent the patch before that other patch was available.

I guess it's a separate issue anyways - this patch is just concerned about 
disabling randomization consistently. Performance optimization can be done
in another one.

-Andi


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/