[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1153121830.3917.2.camel@lapdog.site>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:37:10 +0200
From: "Joachim Deguara" <joachim.deguara@....com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@...e.cz>
cc: "shin, jacob" <jacob.shin@....com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>, discuss@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to
change pstate at same time
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 03:56 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 13:06 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Can you run two such tests *in parallel*? That seemed to break it
> > > really quickly.
> > parallel sounds fun, but I don't get it. Two machine or trying to
> go
> > online and offline at the same time? Firestorming two busy parallel
>
> Trying to online and offline at the same time.
>
> > while loops, one turning the core offline and the other online, did
> not
> > bring an oops so I guess this kernel is in the clear in that regard.
>
> Better run two tight loops, each doing online; offline. I got reports
> it crashed machines before, but maybe it is solved.
yeah, that's what I did. Somethings are easier described in bash than in
english. Nothing crashed or oopsed so the green light is there for
online and offline in 2.6.18-rc1 (with my setup).
-joachim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists