[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060720155909.GA31504@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:59:09 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Joachim Deguara <joachim.deguara@....com>
Cc: "shin, jacob" <jacob.shin@....com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@....com>, discuss@...-64.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...ts.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time
> On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 03:56 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 13:06 +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > Can you run two such tests *in parallel*? That seemed to break it
> > > > really quickly.
> > > parallel sounds fun, but I don't get it. Two machine or trying to
> > go
> > > online and offline at the same time? Firestorming two busy parallel
> >
> > Trying to online and offline at the same time.
> >
> > > while loops, one turning the core offline and the other online, did
> > not
> > > bring an oops so I guess this kernel is in the clear in that regard.
> >
> > Better run two tight loops, each doing online; offline. I got reports
> > it crashed machines before, but maybe it is solved.
>
> yeah, that's what I did. Somethings are easier described in bash than in
> english. Nothing crashed or oopsed so the green light is there for
> online and offline in 2.6.18-rc1 (with my setup).
Okay, I tried hard here, and reproduced some fork failures (and swsusp
panic :-), but not oops.
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists