linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 09/33] Add start-of-day setup hooks to subarch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44BD4956.5020706@goop.org>
Date:	Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:49:26 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Ian Pratt <ian.pratt@...source.com>,
	Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@...cam.ac.uk>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 09/33] Add start-of-day setup hooks to subarch

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> what is this for? Isn't this 1) undocumented and 2) unclear and 3)
> ugly ? (I'm pretty sure the HAVE_ARCH_* stuff is highly deprecated for
> new things nowadays)
>   

It appears to be completely unnecessary.  Xen doesn't use 
sanitize_e820_map(), but there's no obvious harm in leaving it there 
(and it's init code, so there's no long-term cost).


    J

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/