[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44C01CD7.4030308@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:16:23 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>
CC: Ed Lin <ed.lin@...mise.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
hch <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@...l.org>, promise_linux <promise_linux@...mise.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Promise 'stex' driver
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 17:27 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Since _no individual SCSI driver_ uses the block layer
>> tagging, it is likely that some instability and core kernel
>> development
>> will occur, in order to make that work.
>
> That's not quite true: 53c700 and tmscsim both use it ... I could with
> the usage were wider, but at least 53c700 has pretty regular and
> constant usage ... enough I think to validate the block tag code (it's
> been using it for the last three years).
Not for the case being discussed in this thread, adapter-wide tags.
AFAICS, no file in include/scsi/* or drivers/scsi/* ever calls
blk_queue_init_tags() with a non-NULL third arg.
The block tagging capability being discussed here is poorly validated
due to overall underuse, and its never been used in SCSI AFAIK.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists