lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m1hd1bkdv7.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 18:20:28 -0600 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Dan Carpenter" <error27@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: shut down from CPU 0 [regression] "Dan Carpenter" <error27@...il.com> writes: > http://kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=6660316cb7a1a2c59a73a52870490c0f782f45c1 > > Even though you should be able to call ACPI power down from either > CPU, I've seen some BIOSes that implement it wrong. That's why the > code was there. > For example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189052 I don't understand the complaint we should be forcing the action to happen on the boot cpu from another place in the code. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/