[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020607210155v628a51c7td93a647314f4ed78@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:55:23 +0300
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Vadim Lobanov" <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>,
"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
"Shorty Porty" <getshorty_@...mail.com>,
"Peter Williams" <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 2)
On 7/21/06, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> I would say:
>
> #undef true
> #undef false
> enum {
> false = 0,
> true = 1
> };
>
> #define false false
> #define true true
Just curious, why the #defines?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists