lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84144f020607210155v628a51c7td93a647314f4ed78@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 21 Jul 2006 11:55:23 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
	"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	"Vadim Lobanov" <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>,
	"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>,
	"Shorty Porty" <getshorty_@...mail.com>,
	"Peter Williams" <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 2)

On 7/21/06, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> I would say:
>
> #undef true
> #undef false
> enum {
>         false   = 0,
>         true    = 1
> };
>
> #define false false
> #define true true

Just curious, why the #defines?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ